<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>3</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Carles Sierra</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>J. Debenham</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2007</YEAR>
	<TITLE>The LOGIC Negotiation Model</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Sixth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS'2007)</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<PAGES>1026-1033</PAGES>
	<ABSTRACT>Successful negotiators prepare by determining their position along five dimensions: Legitimacy, Options, Goals, Independence, and Commitment, (LOGIC). We introduce a negotiation model based on these dimensions and on two primitive concepts: intimacy (degree of closeness) and balance (degree of fairness). The intimacy is a pair of matrices that evaluate both an agent's contribution to the relationship and its opponent's contribution each from an information view and from a utilitarian view across the five LOGIC dimensions. The balance is the difference between these matrices. A relationship strategy maintains a target intimacy for each relationship that an agent would like the relationship to move towards in future. The negotiation strategy maintains a set of Options that are in-line with the current intimacy level, and then tactics wrap the Options in argumentation with the aim of attaining a successful deal and manipulating the successive negotiation balances towards the target intimacy.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>